data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6411/c641121b6da397a7cc910c4bfb0679f22ab25737" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f796/3f796c2d34919f7fa471e313632bfa4484fcdbff" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0408a/0408a691cb34bedd32c48db507c2b0b6fa317d86" alt=""
And this pieces are quite nice, especially if you're about to head to more warmer tropical locations of this planet. Not noting any places in particular...should I state the obvious...'We need a holiday!'.
'If the Minister is as serious about increased aid as he is about effective aid then I think the two will combine to transform Australia’s role in the world of engagement with the poorest of the poor' ...Bono, U2 Frontman (on Treasurer Peter Costello).
The Government has pledged to increase aid by 2010. This effort however is only expected to lift Australia’s contribution to around 0.36% of the country's wealth. This is predicted to place Australia 19th out of the world’s 22 richest nations for our lack of generosity.
Siobhan will begin her journey to MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY on the MAKEPOVERTY HISTORY ZEROSEVEN Road Trip from 01/07/07 for one week and head down to Sydney. The Road Trip aims to make a call on the Australian government to take action to end extreme poverty by taking action to increase aid to 0.7% of budget by 2015. Along the route from Brisbane to Sydney, there will be a number of MAKEPOVERTY HISTORY events, including 6 MAKEPOVERTYHISTORY concerts. This will provide regional communities, as well as capital cities, with an amazing opportunity to become involved in what is the greatest youth movement of our time.On board and lending their support in various ways are the who’s who of Australian musicians including Missy Higgins, Evermore, Little Birdy, Dallas Crane, Blue King Brown, Antiskeptic, Borne, Bliss n Eso, Guy Sebastian, True Live, Custom Kings, Bias B, Jess Mc Avoy and Symbiosis among others.
Visit her myspace page here.
She's a great photographer so at the end of the trip, she should disperse with some great shots - some of which I will post in the nearby future.
Keep the great work up Bon!
An American attorney "found Hicks at the brink of despair...unable to comprehend
the reality of his trial..." claim of suicide supported by Moazaam Begg, a
British man formerly held at Guantanamo Bay who recounted in his book after
release Enemy Combatant: A British Muslim's Journey to Guantanamo and Back of
Hicks talking about suicidal impulses during his periods in
isolation
"He often talked about wanting to smash his
head...against the metal of his cage and just end it all"
It is notable that if these statements were indeed true, the U.S. government has breached Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions which states that all military detainees are entitled to humane treatment.
On 6 December 2006, Hick's legal team lodged documents with the Federal Court of Australia, arguing that the Australian government had breached its protective duty to Hicks as an Australian citizen in custody overseas, and failed to request that Hicks's incarceration by the U.S. comply with the Geneva Convention, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of HUman Rights. So has the Australian government done enough to protect the human rights of David Hicks? Well earlier this year, in an interview with Southern Cross Broadcasting, Mr. Howard said the following: "....let me simply say that it has gone on for so long now that we will be pressing the Americans almost on a daily basis". Former PM, Malcolm Fraser speaking at the Human Rights Education Conference of 2007, accused the Aus government of betraying Hick's rights and said that the military commission (where Hicks' trial is to commence on Mar 26) had been structured to produce a guilty verdict.
To support Malcolm Fraser's questioning of the legality of the Military Commission in which Hick's trial will be heard, it can be argued that such military commissions breach Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions as it does not amount to a "regularly constituted court aaffording all the judicial guarantees which are recognised as indispensable by civilized peoples". Also, the Int'l Committee of the Red Cross' Customary International Humanitarian Law 355 (2005) explains that courts are 'regularly constituted' under Common Article 3 if they are "established and organised in accordance with the laws and procedures already in force in a country". It must be noted that the military commission which david hicks' trial is to be heard, only came into effect with the passing of the Military Commissions Act 2006 and therefore does not amount to a "regularly constituted" court.
Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights states that "everyone shall be entitled to a fiar and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law". Similarly, Article 75 (4) of Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions 1949 also reiterates this right to a trial before an "impartial" court. Notably, under the Military Commmissions Act 2006, the military commission will be composed of officers appointed from the U.S. armed forces who will act as the jury on questions of fact and will detrmine the sentence if an accused is found guilty by them. Undoubtedly, the system lacks the necessary degree of independent to be impartial and independent. The Military Commission system, therefore, does not safeguard David Hicks' fundamental right as stated in the Geneva Convention and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
So will David Hick's receive a fair trial? The Military Commission rules do not exclude evidence obtained by the use of moral or physical coercion exerted on a prisoner in order to induce him to admit himself guilty of the fact of which he is accused. This breaches the requirement of a fair hearing stated by Article 14 (1) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as well as the fundamental guarantees provided by Article 75(4)(f)of Protocol 1.
Most of you will probably associate it with the prisoner abuse claims that occurred at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq that caused much international controversy about two years ago. Most people who have heard only little or not much about torture techniques may at first see this picture only as a man or woman simply standing, arms stretched on what looks like a cardboard box - or even as a gimmick, something that kept the U.S. army personnel entertained in the middle of nowhere.
Upon closer examination, this photograph reveals a can full of worms, unearthing some of the most gruesome and inexcusable human rights violations that have occurred to date. Alfred McCoy, a historian at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and author of A Question of Torture: CIA Interrogation from the Cold War to the War on Terror (click here for more McCoy's' deconstruction of these images and CIA torture techniques) adds more to this picture by citing that this photo represents two CIA foundational techniques. Firstly, the hood on the detainee acts as a sensory disorientation and deprivation technique. Secondly, his arms stretched out are intended to inflict pain upon him/herself (ie self inflicted pain).
What truly shocks me is the possible legalisation of torture techniques that could allow people such as John Howard and George W. Bush to sign a warrant issued by a judge to authorise torture. Have a look at the picture of the prisoner in Abu Ghraib again. If this person was your father, mother, sister, brother, nephew or friend, would you let this happen to them?
In Neighbour's article, the argument of well-known Harvard academic and criminal lawyer, Alan Dershowitz is used to justify 'painless' torture mechanisms that could be used by governments such as the U.S. and Australia. Dershowitz who claims to not be a supporter of torture contravenes his personal belief and states that governments should be able to use torture as long as they are done so in an "accountable, transparent way." Notably, the U.S. does not have a clean slate in relation to matters dealing with accountability and transparency. For example, no one knew that the U.S. were using torture techniques on the detainees at Guantanamo Bay until one of its own, former chief lawyer for the US Navy, Alberto J. Mora blew the whistle on the use of such torture techniques. Think of the human rights abuse claims made by David Hicks against the U.S. government and the U.S government's failure to bear the onus of such claims.
After reading this, who would you believe...a man imprisoned for over five years without a formal charge or a government which claims itself to be democratic and a signatory to numerous United Nations' human rights conventions, yet exercises a form of modern tyranny.
In the world of the early 21st century national
security concerns loom large
on the international
agenda. Violent conflict, concerns
over terrorist
threats, the proliferation of nuclear
weapons and the growth of illicit
trade
in arms and drugs all pose acute challenges.
Against this backdrop
it is easy to lose sight
of some basic human security imperatives, including
those linked to water.The 1.8 million
child deaths each year related to
unclean water
and poor sanitation dwarf the casualties associated
with
violent conflict. No act of terrorism
generates economic devastation on the
scale of
the crisis in water and sanitation. Yet the issue
barely
registers on the international agenda.It would be interesting if people could get involved and share some ideas or thoughts.
I wasn't going to watch the horses because I am NOT A GAMBLER. I spread the word around my friends and Zanthea (aka Zee) was keen. Got very excited but the excitement subdued and literally died when I did some research and found out from the Queensland Turf Club's website that:
(Under 18s must be accompanied by a responsible adult exercising parental supervision).
ARGHHHHHHHHHHH. Okay, don't panic...think of someone really hard that you know that is over eighteen and will do anything for you....ANSWER: ALEX KALINOE. Made a quick call and all was settled.
Saturday June 2
Woke up early but procrastinated for two hours in bed. Called Alex at 9.45am and asked where she was: almost in the city. Oh $h!t. I did the 'it's okay, I'll be there in no time' attitude and procrastinated some more. Received a text message: 'I'm in the city, let me know when you get in'...I replied: "Don't worry, take your time...I'm still straightening my hair". Half an hour later, I discovered that the zipper on my dress had decided to end its life and not fulfil its purpose - okay, no time to moan and cry - it can be fixed. I then made a mental note to grab a few safety pins when I got into the city. Threw a pair of jeans, boots and jumper on and hopped into a cab and headed directly for the city. Met Alex at Pig N Whistle. She was all glamed up and looked puzzled when she saw how casual I dressed. Lol. I reassured her that I was going to be ready in less than half an hour: first I needed some safety pins, chicken fillets (substitute for strapless bra: ugly silicone 'fake breasts' that push your ahems up) and a quick dash to the Hilton bathrooms to change.
2.30 p.m. Four and a half hours later, I was finally dressed - thankfully, got the safety pins to sit perfectly without protruding out my back, and hailed a cab. "So where are we off to ladies". In a chorus, we both replied: "Eagle Farm Racecourse pleeeeeeeeeease!"
Thanks for an awesome day Lexy. I know you had fun too burning the grass in your Wittner heels to hits like 'Flaunt it' and 'Smack my bitch up'...good times!